I’ve given it a solid try over the past year and have now started calling it Bugroom.
#Fileloupe alternative pro#
Those Phase One guys seem to be a pretty small company and I guess they threw all their resources into C1 Pro development recently. You may want to look at Media Pro (from Phase One), which advertises itself as a solution for large libraries (but even that has a limit of 128.000 images per catalog!):īut here is a similar problem in terms of a lack of development over recent years.
#Fileloupe alternative update#
Photo Mechanic’s website has not seen an update in ages, they still claim to developing a SQL backend for it.
Even Mylio has on their most expensive plan a limit of ”up to 500.000 images”. With an image collection that large I think you are actually out of luck in terms of alternatives. It did not actually affect performance no matter how many images you threw into it (from my experience). From my experience the one tool out there which had the best scaleability was indeed Aperture. It’s database is the bare minimum in terms of functionality and performance. If LR can not handle a giant collection of photos, then neither does C1. 3) Easy migration!!!!!! no more migration headache!!!! switching from Affinity Photo to Photoshop CC or another editor is super easy!!! Here's the advantage of using the OS X Finder and Affinity Photo: 1) less work!!! 2) a lot more editing capabilities. As an photo editor, Affinity Photo can do a lot more than Lightroom and Capture One Pro combined!!!Īperture is the first and last dam for me. Would you believe I find it easer and faster to manage my digital asset in the Finder and edit in Affinity Photo? The fact is this: Affinity Photo adjustments are non-destructive and all edits can be made non-destructive. With tools like Lightroom and Capture One Pro, the user needs to manage their asset in Finder in addition to managing the same asset in these apps. Unfortunately, all of the Aperture alternatives are very weak dams, that it takes more work to manage my assets than not having a dam such as Lightroom and Capture One Pro. When i migrated to Aperture, the dam aspect of Aperture was so good, it added a lot of value for me. Once upon a time, I used to manage my digital asset in the Finder and edited in Photoshop CS. Anyone thinking of migrating away from using dams?
0 kommentar(er)
